Posts: 498
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2023
(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.
Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?
The long-term benefits outweigh the costs, preventing lawsuits through accountability saves taxpayer dollars.
. . loose lips might sink ships
Posts: 610
Threads: 115
Joined: Jul 2023
   
bro, you look like farming credits - talk about this in PVT? and publish the conclusions of Your debates
Posts: 799
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2023
(09-21-2023, 12:11 AM)Eagle Wrote: (09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?
The long-term benefits outweigh the costs, preventing lawsuits through accountability saves taxpayer dollars. I can see both sides. While cameras promote transparency, privacy issues remain concerning. Strict rules on use are needed.
. . loose lips might sink ships
Posts: 610
Threads: 115
Joined: Jul 2023
   
09-24-2023, 03:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-24-2023, 03:20 PM by Yaddmin.)
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.
Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.
Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.
Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
Posts: 498
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2023
09-24-2023, 04:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-24-2023, 04:20 PM by Eagle.)
(09-24-2023, 03:18 PM)Yaddmin Wrote: stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.
But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.
While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote: (09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: (09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.
Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness. Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts Talking to some like-minded people is what you consider leeching? Fair enough have it your away. The concept of debating in a forum existed for years and your opinion isn't gonna change anything for me.
. . loose lips might sink ships
Posts: 610
Threads: 115
Joined: Jul 2023
   
Posting and Reposting - and earn credits HERE
is not the Right way to act on BF
If You reapply are interested in these debates - You talk in SB ( on the forum where we all talk and discuss ) ..
But You act differently - You reply to hundreds of threads just by typing 1 brief sentence ...
Your acting is what is called L-e-ec-hi-n-g
Just admit it and no further problems.
Telling that I am dumb, is ok - But what about facts? Your words are based on some facts ? Or You just spread shit on the ones who dare to advise about your behavior ?
Posts: 250
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2023
(09-05-2023, 10:30 PM)Nimori Wrote: They should keep them when they are in their house and shower too, so we can see it all.
Especially when they fuck their wives
Posts: 41
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2023
(09-28-2023, 12:23 PM)Fly1ngC1rcu5 Wrote: (09-05-2023, 10:30 PM)Nimori Wrote: They should keep them when they are in their house and shower too, so we can see it all.
Especially when they fuck their wives 
Sure you'd regret it once you realize he's gay (Or maybe you won't, I don't judge  )
Posts: 10,305
Threads: 216
Joined: Jun 2023
OF course, but more importantly, an independent body that manages the footage with no outsider influence.
"Universal appeal is poison masquerading as medicine. Horror is not meant to be universal. It's meant to be personal, private, animal"
Posts: 119
Threads: 13
Joined: Jul 2023
No they must not have anything 1312
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: multi-account @ zelenograd
|