Police Body Cameras
by Gattaca - Tuesday August 29, 2023 at 07:31 PM
#11
(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.

Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power

However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?

The long-term benefits outweigh the costs, preventing lawsuits through accountability saves taxpayer dollars.
Reply
#12
bro, you look like farming credits - talk about this in PVT? and publish the conclusions of Your debates
[Image: kj0215pd.png]
[Image: 1984.jpg]
Reply
#13
(09-21-2023, 12:11 AM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power

However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?

The long-term benefits outweigh the costs, preventing lawsuits through accountability saves taxpayer dollars.
I can see both sides. While cameras promote transparency, privacy issues remain concerning. Strict rules on use are needed.
Reply
#14
stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.

Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power

However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote: While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.

Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.

Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power


stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
[Image: kj0215pd.png]
[Image: 1984.jpg]
Reply
#15
(09-24-2023, 03:18 PM)Yaddmin Wrote: stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-20-2023, 09:05 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote: Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power

However, the costs of storage and maintenance are really high. Is funding cameras the best use of limited budgets?

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-09-2023, 10:21 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 09:01 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-09-2023, 08:31 PM)Eagle Wrote: It provides transparency and accountability so yeah police officers should wear body cameras at all times while on duty.

But doesn't constant surveillance infringe on officers' privacy? It seems excessive.

While valid, the public right to oversight outweighs this. It protects both citizens and good police.

stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts

(09-10-2023, 09:05 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 05:29 PM)mega-mind Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 03:48 PM)Eagle Wrote:
(09-10-2023, 07:57 AM)mega-mind Wrote: Many officers feel cameras make them feel distrusted though. It can damage morale and discourage recruitment.

Perhaps initially, but well-implemented cameras build community trust, safety, and confidence in law enforcement
Body cams only show limited perspectives. More cameras don't inherently improve relations and fairness.
Partial views are still better than no footage, cameras provide important evidence and deter abuses of power


stop leeching by dumb dialogs . It's evident that You are farming credits when you talk like this in hundreds of posts.. What the fuck You talk here and not in SB ?this kind of debates ar NOT to be done through posts
Talking to some like-minded people is what you consider leeching? Fair enough have it your away. The concept of debating in a forum existed for years and your opinion isn't gonna change anything for me.
Reply
#16
Posting and Reposting - and earn credits HERE
is not the Right way to act on BF
If You reapply are interested in these debates - You talk in SB ( on the forum where we all talk and discuss ) ..
But You act differently - You reply to hundreds of threads just by typing 1 brief sentence ...
Your acting is what is called L-e-ec-hi-n-g
Just admit it and no further problems.
Telling that I am dumb, is ok - But what about facts? Your words are based on some facts ? Or You just spread shit on the ones who dare to advise about your behavior ?
[Image: kj0215pd.png]
[Image: 1984.jpg]
Reply
#17
(09-05-2023, 10:30 PM)Nimori Wrote: They should keep them when they are in their house and shower too, so we can see it all.

Especially when they fuck their wives Smile
Reply
#18
(09-28-2023, 12:23 PM)Fly1ngC1rcu5 Wrote:
(09-05-2023, 10:30 PM)Nimori Wrote: They should keep them when they are in their house and shower too, so we can see it all.

Especially when they fuck their wives Smile

Sure you'd regret it once you realize he's gay (Or maybe you won't, I don't judge Wink )
Reply
#19
OF course, but more importantly, an independent body that manages the footage with no outsider influence.
"Universal appeal is poison masquerading as medicine. Horror is not meant to be universal. It's meant to be personal, private, animal"
Reply
#20
No they must not have anything 1312
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: multi-account @zelenograd
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Do you do waxing? Which method do you use to wax your entire body and intimate parts? Ater 5 779 11-26-2024, 06:30 AM
Last Post: Hermit64

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this thread: