Statement Regarding Pompompurin.
by Baphomet - Sunday July 16, 2023 at 07:27 AM
#11
Damn, child pornograhy. Kind of good he's gone who knew how long he woulda been havin that shit lmao
#12
(07-16-2023, 07:27 AM)Baphomet Wrote: As always any important updates can be found on my website:

https://baph.is/updates/pom_final_update.txt.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello everyone.

I think it's important we discuss something that I know a lot of people have asked me about in the past couple of days, and that is specifically the charges that Pompompurin has pled to guilty to:
https://www.databreaches.net/owner-of-breachforums-pleads-guilty-in-federal-court-to-a-charge-that-shocks-everyone/

While the first two charges pretty much line up with what I think most of us expected, there was a third additional charge that took everyone by surprise (including myself):
18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2) Possession of Child Pornography

I'd encourage everyone to read the article I posted as it clearly explains a summary of the information very well. Like everyone else, I was completely surprised by this update. I tried to reason that maybe there is something that was being pinned on him and that he couldn't possibly have done something like this. Someone I've been friends with for years would go and do something like this. But if you look at the details of the plea, there is very little room open to interpretation.

So to make it very clear to everyone, I am incredibly disgusted by his actions and in no way condone the shit he did. I had no clue he was someone like this, as we took a very heavy stance against any user who shares CSAM material on the forum - not only banning them, but leaking their information as well. It seems that was merely a mask for Pom to go and do the same thing in the background.

Let me make one other thing very fucking clear if it is not already somehow, posting or even involving yourself in anything related to the exploitation of minors on this forum will only result in a bad fucking time. We make it very clear in two seperate places that anything relating to NSFW have to be adults:

https://breached.vc/Announcement-Leak-Section-Rules (our leaks section rules)
https://breached.vc/misc.php?action=help&hid=8 (our general rules)

See this thread as well as a third confirmation that if you are a pedophile, you are not welcome here at all. We don't allow your degenerate behaviour on our forum and anyone doing it or encouraging it will be permanently banned.

I understand there is probably a lot to be said, but I wanted to make it clear my stance on this situation. We are going to give Breached a better legacy, and that starts by me making sure we are open about things that are not acceptable in our community.

- - Baph
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LlMo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Still insane that he was charged with that. I think it took us all by surprise.
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Scamming | Fat American | Last Known IP: 173.17.118.177
#13
Stop.

On or about March 15, 2023, in the Southern District of New York, the defendant, CONOR BRIAN FITZPATRICK (a/k/a “Pompompurin”), did knowingly possess and attempt to possess at least one matter containing one or more visual depictions that had been transported using a means and facility of interstate and foreign commerce, and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and which visual depictions were produced using materials which had been mailed and so shipped and transported, by any means including by computer; and the production of such visual depictions involved the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and such visual depictions were of such conduct, to wit: videos depicting prepubescent minors and minors who had not attained 12 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct, stored on a Dell Inspiron 5593 laptop computer (service tag number B2W9723) with a Samsung 870 QVO 4TB solid state drive (SN S5VYNJ0T405292K).
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2)).

In no word they said, that he SENT/SPREAD the material. In fact, everyone with the wrong mailprogram settings receiving such a picture would be guilty to this. That is something that can happen if someone wants to make you look guilty. It also does not say if he asked for it or that he knew at that time, that the person on the picture was a minor.

I am not trying to defend someone who is a pedo, but in that case we all can't be sure. He was a kid himself, that would make no sense.
#14
Maybe change the reason for pom's ban

[Image: cp.png]
#15
lmfao
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Scammed @Sneed
#16
(07-16-2023, 06:30 PM)TheGoodlife Wrote: Stop.

On or about March 15, 2023, in the Southern District of New York, the defendant, CONOR BRIAN FITZPATRICK (a/k/a “Pompompurin”), did knowingly possess and attempt to possess at least one matter containing one or more visual depictions that had been transported using a means and facility of interstate and foreign commerce, and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and which visual depictions were produced using materials which had been mailed and so shipped and transported, by any means including by computer; and the production of such visual depictions involved the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and such visual depictions were of such conduct, to wit: videos depicting prepubescent minors and minors who had not attained 12 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct, stored on a Dell Inspiron 5593 laptop computer (service tag number B2W9723) with a Samsung 870 QVO 4TB solid state drive (SN S5VYNJ0T405292K).
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2)).

In no word they said, that he SENT/SPREAD the material. In fact, everyone with the wrong mailprogram settings receiving such a picture would be guilty to this. That is something that can happen if someone wants to make you look guilty. It also does not say if he asked for it or that he knew at that time, that the person on the picture was a minor.

I am not trying to defend someone who is a pedo, but in that case we all can't be sure. He was a kid himself, that would make no sense.

I had the same thoughts you did. And I am still having trouble believing it all, but there is another court  filing that you may not have seen. It was the Statement of Facts that details what Pom agreed the prosecution would have been able to show if this case had gone to trial.  From that document:

Quote:
FITZPATRICK's Possession of Child Pornography 

37. FITZPATRICK knowingly possessed approximately 26 files containing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct on his Samsung 870 QVO 4TB solid state drive (SN S5VYNJ0T405292K) ("Samsung SSD"). 

38. FITZPATRICK used his Samsung SSD with his Dell Inspiron 5593 laptop computer (service tag number B2W9723). These devices were seized from FITZPATRICK's home in New York on March 15, 2023, pursuant to a federal search warrant. 

39. Law enforcement performed a digital forensic examination of FITZPATRICK's Samsung SSD, which revealed he had saved child pomography in two folders. Many of the files had file names and phrases indicative of child pomography, such as "14yo," "15yo," and "Hebephilia." 

40. For example, FITZPATRICK possessed a video file with "13y-fully-nude" in the title. This video depicts a minor female who exposes her genitals and masturbates. FITZPATRICK saved this video file to his Samsung SSD on February 9, 2023. Forensic artifacts show that FITZPATRICK opened this file after he saved it. 

41. FITZPATRICK also possessed a video file with "Girl_Hebephilia" in the file title. This video depicts two nude prepubescent females. During the video, the girls expose their genitals to the camera and masturbate. FITZPATRICK saved this video file to his Samsung SSD on Febmary 9, 2023. Forensic artifacts show that FITZPATRICK opened this file after he saved it. 

42. The Dell Inspiron 5593 laptop computer and the Samsung SSD were manufactured outside the state of New York, and thus had, at the time of the seizure, been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce. Moreover, these devices belonged to FITZPATRICK and were used solely by him.

And .... he pleaded guilty to that. 

A number of people in this forum confuse certain terms, though, so let me add that the professional literature keeps changing definitions and mucking things up, but: 

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children by an adult.  It does not mean that the adult *acts* on that sexual attraction in any way.  Similarly, a person can possess child pornography without being a "pedophile." Possession of child pornography is a crime, not a disorder.  Pom was charged with that crime (possession), and pleading guilty means that yes, he admits they found that material on his computer.  It doesn't say anything about why he had it -- just having it is the crime.
Data Breach Goddess and Coffee Addict at DataBreaches.net
 Email: info@databreaches.net or breaches@protonmail.ch
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
#17
Why he do this
#18
Far right angry conservative always ranting about how libs are cucks are pedos ends up being a pedo. Tale as old as time.....
#19
take it hes never coming back then. 

i used to look up to that guy
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Compromised account.
#20
Honestly didn't expect this from him. Im curious why he would have that stuff since he used to willingly fight against pedophiles on the forum


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  IMPORTANT-READ Statement Regarding BreachForums N∕A 0 711 07-25-2025, 02:16 PM
Last Post: N∕A

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)