[chanvria]

My goodness, I don't know why I wasted my time debating this with you... you can't even read. The old 200M dataset is the one that took about 66 days, and it was scraped via the API, unlikely by an employee.

Yea Im not really reading you since you dont know what you are talking about lol
Also , there is no way to know the 200M scrape took 66 days too. So my point still stands. (Or maybe the TA who did it told it somewhere and you are just trying to twist that as you using your super-secret technique to find out)

 And if you think it could have been web crawling, or it was collected over the course of a few years, or that "utc_offset" is available in the latest API, it's time for you to go back to the kiddie pool before you drown in the deep end.

Anyways, I'm done trying to discuss this with you. I can overlook personal attacks, but I thrive on the truth, and you can't handle the truth. I've added you to my ignore list.

Ok you are clearly retarded , happy to be on your ignore list.
Go back to writing 8 pages of twitter-level idiotslop FUD for tech illiterate journos of Forbes & reading Troy Hunt tweets.
The only ''truth'' you can handle is your own , that you already made in your mind before even doing your thesis statement-analysis.

[ThinkingOne]

Well, Troy Hunt "Finally got around to taking a look at" the "2025 2.8 billion Twitter breach merged with 2023 200M Twitter breach" post of mine.

And completely failed to acknowledge that there was a breach involving 2.8 billion Twitter accounts, and that emails, phones, IPs and passwords may have been compromised ("no new privacy risk" he says).

<sigh>

I wonder if he and Anon Gal even bothered to read the original post, or downloaded the 2.8 billion dataset that was leaked.