SCAM REPORT - 600$ @SunS
by vebxpert - Wednesday February 12, 2025 at 03:05 PM
#11
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 04:13 AM)Loki Wrote: @SunS the samples are to understand the database headers along with the data. It is for the buyer to use the samples to understand the utility of the data, but it cannot be taken as a direct indicator to the quality of the data.

There are times when there are empty columns in a db due to invalid or empty user input, among other reasons. While I do not advocate for 90% of the address fields missing,

I need proof that the terms about the quality of the data, specifically for the address column, were made part of the escrow transaction.

If nothing of that sort was agreed upon as the condition for escrow transaction, the funds will be finalized in favor of the seller.

As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.
[Image: e47c91a87cc521d1efbd20183b42ee4259c9c593.gifv]
PGP
Reply
#12
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 04:13 AM)Loki Wrote: @SunS the samples are to understand the database headers along with the data. It is for the buyer to use the samples to understand the utility of the data, but it cannot be taken as a direct indicator to the quality of the data.

There are times when there are empty columns in a db due to invalid or empty user input, among other reasons. While I do not advocate for 90% of the address fields missing,

I need proof that the terms about the quality of the data, specifically for the address column, were made part of the escrow transaction.

If nothing of that sort was agreed upon as the condition for escrow transaction, the funds will be finalized in favor of the seller.

As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.
Reply
#13
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 04:13 AM)Loki Wrote: @SunS the samples are to understand the database headers along with the data. It is for the buyer to use the samples to understand the utility of the data, but it cannot be taken as a direct indicator to the quality of the data.

There are times when there are empty columns in a db due to invalid or empty user input, among other reasons. While I do not advocate for 90% of the address fields missing,

I need proof that the terms about the quality of the data, specifically for the address column, were made part of the escrow transaction.

If nothing of that sort was agreed upon as the condition for escrow transaction, the funds will be finalized in favor of the seller.

As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.
[Image: e47c91a87cc521d1efbd20183b42ee4259c9c593.gifv]
PGP
Reply
#14
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 04:13 AM)Loki Wrote: @SunS the samples are to understand the database headers along with the data. It is for the buyer to use the samples to understand the utility of the data, but it cannot be taken as a direct indicator to the quality of the data.

There are times when there are empty columns in a db due to invalid or empty user input, among other reasons. While I do not advocate for 90% of the address fields missing,

I need proof that the terms about the quality of the data, specifically for the address column, were made part of the escrow transaction.

If nothing of that sort was agreed upon as the condition for escrow transaction, the funds will be finalized in favor of the seller.

As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.
he bought 2 dbs for 600$. he only reported Matahari.com dbs. I gave a discount above, but you see he gave reasons for not paying. He also didn't ask for the conditions of the columns in the deal. 500$ is my final price, and the forum donation is 100$. 400$
qTox: 01997997BDD367CCC5E0BF677AB6EFFF1FD4957054DCD67E4D81CB7D1BFEC9591B3817B21D08
I don't use TG, contact me only with qTox/BF
Reply
#15
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 04:13 AM)Loki Wrote: @SunS the samples are to understand the database headers along with the data. It is for the buyer to use the samples to understand the utility of the data, but it cannot be taken as a direct indicator to the quality of the data.

There are times when there are empty columns in a db due to invalid or empty user input, among other reasons. While I do not advocate for 90% of the address fields missing,

I need proof that the terms about the quality of the data, specifically for the address column, were made part of the escrow transaction.

If nothing of that sort was agreed upon as the condition for escrow transaction, the funds will be finalized in favor of the seller.

As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.

Because the seller's sample is deceptive and actually has no value, 20K of useful data is unacceptable to anyone; I can accept the other data, so I can only pay the other price, 300USD.
 If the seller does not accept it, then I can only trouble the administrator to set up a real-time chat place to facilitate communication. After all, the timeliness of communication in the forum is not timely; 
PS: I am not unwilling to pay, I also have other transaction records in the forum, which are very fast; I just bought a bad thing;
Reply
#16
(02-28-2025, 04:12 PM)Empire Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote: As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.
he bought 2 dbs for 600$. he only reported Matahari.com dbs. I gave a discount above, but you see he gave reasons for not paying. He also didn't ask for the conditions of the columns in the deal. 500$ is my final price, and the forum donation is 100$. 400$

I dont think you are being very fair considering that you know that the data was missing from those columns. I gave you a chance to fix it but it seems like I need to intervene.

I need to take a closer look at the data to see how much of it has missing columns, and is it the same picture painted by the samples in your selling thread. If there is a drastic change from that, you will issue a 50% discount. If the changes are not drastically different from the samples, you will not give any discount.



(03-01-2025, 01:02 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-19-2025, 05:22 AM)SunS Wrote: As a sample, it should not be modified. Why should you show your modified data to customers? The data has lost its authenticity .right??

htps://pastebin.com/Eb0TWwpT seller's samples in the post, we need the real lines ahout the data, not the real lines
https://pastebin.com/Wsg4FMXH the data i bought from the seller, real data like this
there are different ,It is the data modified by the seller, which is deceptive, and the seller did not provide me with any other samples. All the data is based on the data shown by the seller in the post.
I have shown you his actual sample and the sample in the post, which are different. You need to check them separately. I also replied with a screenshot in the previous post.
your samples in your post   https://ibb.co/WNkbLqntthe
data you gave to me ,99% part are blank ,especially the address column
https://ibb.co/wZ09ZThr

I don't understand, isn't this considered cheating?

We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.

(02-21-2025, 11:35 AM)Empire Wrote: While waiting for a resolution, we also take responsibility for not clarifying the details of the columns, This leads to misunderstandings among buyers, previously my customers would ask to check the quantity of each column in detail, because you did not have the requirement.I will take 100$ off this deal and 100$ donate to the forum, also expect other major data breaches from me

@SunS if you find it ok, or have any problem with data please feedback

@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.

Because the seller's sample is deceptive and actually has no value, 20K of useful data is unacceptable to anyone; I can accept the other data, so I can only pay the other price, 300USD.
 If the seller does not accept it, then I can only trouble the administrator to set up a real-time chat place to facilitate communication. After all, the timeliness of communication in the forum is not timely; 
PS: I am not unwilling to pay, I also have other transaction records in the forum, which are very fast; I just bought a bad thing;

I am not on telegram, contact me on session to share the details. My session is listed on my profile.
[Image: e47c91a87cc521d1efbd20183b42ee4259c9c593.gifv]
PGP
Reply
#17
(03-01-2025, 02:49 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 04:12 PM)Empire Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote: We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.


@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.
he bought 2 dbs for 600$. he only reported Matahari.com dbs. I gave a discount above, but you see he gave reasons for not paying. He also didn't ask for the conditions of the columns in the deal. 500$ is my final price, and the forum donation is 100$. 400$

I dont think you are being very fair considering that you know that the data was missing from those columns. I gave you a chance to fix it but it seems like I need to intervene.

I need to take a closer look at the data to see how much of it has missing columns, and is it the same picture painted by the samples in your selling thread. If there is a drastic change from that, you will issue a 50% discount. If the changes are not drastically different from the samples, you will not give any discount.



(03-01-2025, 01:02 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-25-2025, 05:42 AM)Loki Wrote: We have specific fields in the escrow system to lay down the deal conditions/terms of fulfillment.

If you failed to use that to state what percentage of duplicates or missing fields can be accepted without issues, we could take this argument.

Unfortunately, you did not. Neither can you prove that the data was modified by the seller, as this could very well have been the way it was stored in the db.


@SunS I personally think you should accept this offer, and please make sure to mention the terms explicitly in the escrow deal.

I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.

Because the seller's sample is deceptive and actually has no value, 20K of useful data is unacceptable to anyone; I can accept the other data, so I can only pay the other price, 300USD.
 If the seller does not accept it, then I can only trouble the administrator to set up a real-time chat place to facilitate communication. After all, the timeliness of communication in the forum is not timely; 
PS: I am not unwilling to pay, I also have other transaction records in the forum, which are very fast; I just bought a bad thing;

I am not on telegram, contact me on session to share the details. My session is listed on my profile.
contact you  by session already
Reply
#18
@Loki waiting for your verdict, the buyer does not have any request for columns from me? i do not accept the sale of 2 dbs for 300$ (buy 1 get 1 free), you should verify if that database is correct and release my money
qTox: 01997997BDD367CCC5E0BF677AB6EFFF1FD4957054DCD67E4D81CB7D1BFEC9591B3817B21D08
I don't use TG, contact me only with qTox/BF
Reply
#19
(03-01-2025, 04:37 AM)SunS Wrote:
(03-01-2025, 02:49 AM)Loki Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 04:12 PM)Empire Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote: I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.
he bought 2 dbs for 600$. he only reported Matahari.com dbs. I gave a discount above, but you see he gave reasons for not paying. He also didn't ask for the conditions of the columns in the deal. 500$ is my final price, and the forum donation is 100$. 400$

I dont think you are being very fair considering that you know that the data was missing from those columns. I gave you a chance to fix it but it seems like I need to intervene.

I need to take a closer look at the data to see how much of it has missing columns, and is it the same picture painted by the samples in your selling thread. If there is a drastic change from that, you will issue a 50% discount. If the changes are not drastically different from the samples, you will not give any discount.



(03-01-2025, 01:02 AM)SunS Wrote:
(02-28-2025, 02:03 PM)Loki Wrote:
(02-26-2025, 07:03 AM)SunS Wrote: I believe the data exists in the correct way, and the seller also gave the original data; 
However, his data is different from the sample, and we must admit the problem;
I purchased the data because of the completeness of the sample. If the data is different from the sample, why should I purchase it?
I have screenshots in my previous post to illustrate this; If I am not detailed enough or the description is not clear enough, the administrator can intervene between me and the seller and create a small telegram group so that I can explain how he deceived the seller. 

I don't mind paying, but this data should not be worth $600, because I only got 20-30K in the same format as the sample, and the rest of the data is incorrect.

If the data varies a lot from the samples, the seller needs to give a discount. Based on the percentage of missing fields as compared to the samples, the discount needs to be calculated proportionately. Keeping in mind that no such conditions were set prior to the deal, it will be upto the seller's discretion about the % of discount.

@Empire please evaluate and respond with the % of discount you think would be fair in this situation and why.

Because the seller's sample is deceptive and actually has no value, 20K of useful data is unacceptable to anyone; I can accept the other data, so I can only pay the other price, 300USD.
 If the seller does not accept it, then I can only trouble the administrator to set up a real-time chat place to facilitate communication. After all, the timeliness of communication in the forum is not timely; 
PS: I am not unwilling to pay, I also have other transaction records in the forum, which are very fast; I just bought a bad thing;

I am not on telegram, contact me on session to share the details. My session is listed on my profile.
contact you  by session already

Please do not refrain from getting to the point when you contact me. Skip the Hi's. nohello.net
[Image: e47c91a87cc521d1efbd20183b42ee4259c9c593.gifv]
PGP
Reply
#20
suns is right in this case, i think
This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Scamming | IP: 176.222.57.23
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  scam report merc sishko 2 441 04-14-2025, 07:14 PM
Last Post: 888
  Scam Report @TarxMedia asjfnsdjkdf324 2 296 04-14-2025, 07:07 PM
Last Post: 888
  Scam Report against @donjuji | 250$ oiledup 3 415 04-14-2025, 04:01 PM
Last Post: oiledup
  scam 2000usdt @Z_intel im_undefined 4 365 04-12-2025, 09:15 PM
Last Post: im_undefined
  Scam Report against RedBlock | 250$ freedom 33 1,704 04-12-2025, 04:45 AM
Last Post: gabbz

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)