[Zix]

I'd like to note that this isn't that common of an occurrence, at least yet, so I'd not be too worried about this.  Also, you can always report a reputation given and an moderator will take a look it.

 
~~~ Zixshore ~~~

This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Self-Ban | http://breached26tezcofqla4adzyn22notfqw...an-Appeals if you wish to be unbanned in the future.

[halburt]

I feel like the simplest solution would be to add requirement that your account needs to be a certain age and/or have made X amount of posts in order to give rep.

[ilikecats]

I think same should go for +rep. rep4rep is so common but idk who would keep an eye on that lmao

facts man
and if you point it out you get harrased by the people
THGIS IS SO UNFGAIR
THE MODS SEEMS TO BE BIASED

---

• You can create a rule so that new users have more requirements to give -Rep, because I see in the future that will be a constant attack of trolls doing the same damaging the reputation wall of good users.
  

i am against this, what if someone got scammed and happens to be a blue user, why shouldn't he be allowed to rep the guys who were responsible?
or neg repping someone who makes shitty threads?

the best option would be to report the neg rep someone received from such user (just like @Zix said)

[jb75]

A bit off topic, but I think that the (negative?) reputations assigned by an account should also be deleted when it is banned. Maybe we can keep the positive ones to see the links between multi-accounts?

[paw]

THGIS IS SO UNFGAIR
THE MODS SEEMS TO BE BIASED

nigga did you really calling the moderators biased after what you doing since u created ur account?
the only reason u coming online is to giving other people negative reputations for no reason at all u
are a persistent liar and manipulator who do nothing else then shitpost i begging the people to look at

your account and call me wrong. and if people doing somenthing against it like letting the posts or reputation
removed u calling the moderators biased and they should not did it so u can do what u always do destroying
reputations of other people - u should be permanently banned from this community

[420]

A bit off topic, but I think that the (negative?) reputations assigned by an account should also be deleted when it is banned. Maybe we can keep the positive ones to see the links between multi-accounts?

Imo its kinda impossible to identify someone as a multi-accounter just because who they rep. Also in my opinion no matter how much rep, awards and shit, people can always scam you so I would just recommend to use escrow. Kinda off-topic but why tf the escrow service is only for clearnet mirror by the way?

edit: I agree that if someone is actually trying to destroy someones reputation, either by himself or even with his friends, they all should get banned for good.

[slacky]

Today a (new) user bluegflag ( zerolord4 ) abused the -Rep command by distributing negative ratings in a Troll manner to all the Top users of the forum being affected: @Tanaka @Rey @DredgenSun @Nam3L3ss

• You can create a rule so that new users have more requirements to give -Rep, because I see in the future that will be a constant attack of trolls doing the same damaging the reputation wall of good users.
  

• Yes, he was banned, but I'm sure he's going to create more accounts and fatten them up on Rep and then start the senseless attack again.
  

Trolling people gaving -rep are so stupid, some people needs to fuck. Wasting time is for poor guy

[Loki]

1. 10 EUR isnt hard to pay for anyone.
2. Those who want to -rep, and are creating new un-ranked accounts, can only -rep 2 people at a time, with a -1 score each. Top members of the forum have ~1-2k rep which will not be affected significantly by the -rep.
3. -reps that violate reputation section rules need to be reported by the user and they will be reviewed by the staff.