[ExamServices]

We created ( @ExamServices and @gosh ) a fake OSCP AD set ( MS01 v7 GraphQL ) and shared it on some TG groups to check who is reselling my stuff.
I even added it to my shop to be more credible, but with no payment option ( so you can see it but can't buy it ).
The latest official OSCP AD set added by offsec is " MS01v6 Tomcat ", it is no such thing as " MS01 v7 GraphQL "
I don't know how they are selling " MS01 v7 GraphQL " without even checking if it's real or not.
It is frustrating when you spend many hours/days solving the exams and they are reselling your work for half a price or even cheaper.

MS01 v7 GraphQL download link: https://files.catbox.moe/8c6ese.pdf

Proof :

1 . @OSCPdumper https://breachforums.hn/User-OSCPdumper

https://gyazo.com/6b9277c333a2544e9d5ab01658029a21

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/pa2Zqq4



2. @m3t4verSe https://breachforums.hn/User-m3t4verSe

https://gyazo.com/2b8a2e679ae37c149254baaa2eedd183

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/n2CwRUM


3. @BrianOSCP https://breachforums.hn/User-BrianOSCP

https://gyazo.com/7e9c52b293d81be9de21d23733631040

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/GqDFhDS


4. @ir0nm3n https://breachforums.hn/User-ir0nm3n

https://gyazo.com/de429ffe3585b90cf5fb7e6f535eb1fa

Here he contacted me after i shared the .pdf on a TG group

https://gyazo.com/7e7692c3b7089393679c0aae700f20fb
https://gyazo.com/9bb430e6eaadf8b50b1780ec5e7dca32
https://gyazo.com/31ea6c266eea5abe97a648e304f35b5f

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/Mhn2POD

5. @Mrh3lpful https://breachforums.hn/User-Mrh3lpful

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/rdUHr4c

6. @RhysOffsec https://breachforums.hn/User-RhysOffsec

Here he is trying to sell it

https://imgur.com/a/NwdWUF1

7. @offsecSeller https://breachforums.hn/User-offsecSeller

https://gyazo.com/d84ef534a415e98dd9eb555d0fb70c89


It seems the rules are not for everyone.

https://breachforums.hn/Announcement-Mar...tion-Rules

[ir0nm3n]

@Baphomet
Administrator, let’s discuss whether Entrapment is a reasonable method. I saw this report in TG and judged it seem to be correct. Then someone immediately added me to discord and posted the agreed nmap scan results. So I think this is valid. At present, it seems that these sellers are collaborating to entrapment and use this method to suppress other sellers. I am shocked by the method they use. Okay, I have deleted the report so far, and it has not caused any real problems.  i were selling a leak from telegram, i didn't resell from any seller in the forum. According to the rules of the forum, this is not considered a violation. However, I think my behavior was indeed inappropriate, and I admit my mistake. I accept any determination of the administrator on this matter, thank you

This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Multi-Accounting @blackadam | http://breached26tezcofqla4adzyn22notfqw...an-Appeals if you feel this is incorrect.

[m3t4verSe]

someone trade this report with me buddy and he said it was in exam didn't get it from any telegram group when i recieved it before that there was lots of sellers they were selling it so i though its new ad and when your fake discord guy confirm he was in exam then its give me more confirmation this is existing so please don't play such type of games, i never sold your reports this was i got from someone even i was not sure its yours else i will never sell it lol i am selling stuff from older breachforum

now lets talk about same operation i also did same operation but without spreading any fake report and i found you are also selling public reports so same thing applied to you bro because those reports you are selling those reports are available on public place since 2023 so if we are guilty you are also in same boat i will share those proof with @Baphomet

[Mrh3lpful]

OK OK It was a shit move from both of you. You guys thought that we steal your stuff and resell??? NO. We updated it in our own way.
I was shocked when I saw this post. I got some people sending me the nmap results for MS01v7 but I don't have it, I told them I don't have it. Then 2 days ago, I met a guy who wanna trade with me the GraphQL MS01v7 for some standalones, so we made the deal. I didn't even edit my thread and always tell people that I don't verify and rewrite it to make it mine as you can see in the provided screenshot. That's how I updated my writeups. It's not consider as resell cuz I don't resell things from other sellers. I say NO with resell.

It's ok I'm sorry and will learn from what happened.
If @Baphomet want to know the proof of anything from my before words, I'm happy to share.
Thank you

[OSCPdumper]

because of your fake ad set lots of clients asked about v7 to me. in a day if 5-7 guys are asking for v7 then where option left to verify it bro and its not possible to directly ask to offsec its exists or not from client we can verify things when its in on demand obviously everyone thinks its exists. before selling report i have created my own thats not your product you generated it but from what i have got i have just rewrite my own.

[BrianOSCP]

Good morning everyone, I just woke up and saw this thread, I was shocked to see my username here.

I acknowledge that ExamServices is a longstanding vendor on the forums while I am smaller, focusing only on selling OSCP. After seeing MS01v6 released for 2 weeks, he (ExamServices) immediately updated to MS01v7, which made me somewhat suspicious. However, some Telegram and Discord accounts asked me about the new AD (providing accurate nmap scan results), which made me believe that there was indeed a new GraphQL AD released.

Later on, I received information from my old buyer who wanted to send me MS01v7 in exchange for my help his friend to pass the OSCP. I agreed, and that's what he sent me. We had previous transactions and I trusted him completely. He even mentioned putting a lot of effort into solving the new AD, so I trusted him a lot.

Today, I came across this thread that specifically accuses me of reselling ExamServices's products. I don't even know what he sells or how, LOL. This is deceptive and aimed at sabotaging someone else's work.

I admit that I can't update products as quickly as he does, but I still update them by directly helping my customers pass (Remote passing).

In conclusion, I take responsibility for not verifying the necessary details before selling it.

[ExamServices]

I have a question,if you're selling a writeup for something you haven't solved and the customer stuck during the exam how you can help him? Or you're selling it without any support,you got the money and that's it?That is the main issue on the exam market,many "sellers" are ghosting the customers after the deal was done.

[m3t4verSe]

I have a question,if you're selling a writeup for something you haven't solved and the customer stuck during the exam how you can help him? Or you're selling it without any support,you got the money and that's it?That is the main issue on the exam market,many "sellers" are ghosting the customers after the deal was done.

that report i got from was a client and there steps was pretty clear and till now never ghosted if i do this type of cheap activity then someone obivously report me but you can check in older breachforum too and here too zero report against me and i can show tons of proof there i have helped my all client wherever they stuck during exams that i sell. so dont add everyone in same category about reselling i have already shared proof to @Baphomet will wait for his decision

[Baphomet]

Where do I even start on this report.

The exams marketplace has somehow been the only marketplace that is constantly on thin ice, and despite how many times we attempt to intervene just seems to get worse. Now we've got vendors carrying out covert operations against eachother to show how bad its gotten. This marketplace on our forum annoys me like no other, because people pay a lot for your products and services and yet few vendors seem to have their shit together. I'm going to attempt to acknowledge all parts of this report, so feel free to read on.

First off, while I don't agree with the method exactly it does show that many vendors are likely not even experienced in the exams they are selling and are simply spot checking reports they find and modifying it ways they think will make it unique to them so they don't break rules. I've made it clear that while I don't expect every vendor to have passed every exam service they offer, they need to have knowledge in some capacity of the exams they are offering products/services for.

The problem with such a thing like this, is the same as any marketplace. You go and start selling this (fake) product that looks to be the most current version, you basically force your competition to quickly do whatever they can to offer the same product. So while in some sense you proved they were quick to start selling this fake copy, you essentially created a demand for it leaving some vendors no choice but to take whatever version is out there in hopes of remaining competitive.

I'm not sure exactly what we need to do from here, since no one seems to have the right answer. I can't make any section mods for exams marketplace because the only people who have even knowledge are vendors, and will likely use that position to attack their competition. And obviously vendors are constantly attacking one another, so I have to spend an absurd amount of time verifying something that admittedly im not experienced with, leaving gaps.

So here is my resolution. Since all the vendors seem to sit around and hold hands with eachother, then I expect them to get together and come up with a plan on how we improve the exam marketplace and resolve these reoccuring issues. When I have time I'll reach out to a few vendors for their opinions. I'm going to give a week from this post to either resolve it with the vendors or I'm just going to nuke the entire section. So combine your brain cells remaining, and figure this shit out.

I should make it clear, a half-assed solution to save your section won't work here. A simple "actually everything is okay" will not work here. We are going to revamp your entire section, so make an effort at this point. Stop disrespecting our users with this nonsense.

This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: None

[ir0nm3n]

@Baphomet
I wholeheartedly concur with the administrator's viewpoint: establishing clear rules is essential. Engaging in attacks against one another, especially through manipulative tactics, is not only disruptive but also deeply frustrating. Should a select few individuals target others with the intent to suppress. My earnest hope is for mutual respect, refraining from slander, and collectively striving to deliver superior service to our clients. Out of respect for the administrator and in pursuit of a constructive resolution, I look forward to a resolution that honors the dignity and integrity of our community.

This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Multi-Accounting @blackadam | http://breached26tezcofqla4adzyn22notfqw...an-Appeals if you feel this is incorrect.