[RedBlock]

@Loki
I did suggest using BreachForums escrow multiple times, and the buyer declined. I have shared proof in my previous comment. I still offered him an alternative arrangement, allowing him to take the exam and pay afterward. This was not a refusal of escrow; it was an option I provided based on his preferences. There is no mistake in that from my side. If i had to scan him then why would have keep him insisting it again and again to use escrow.
Regarding the Telegram contact, there is some confusion around the communication. I was under the impression that I wasn’t contacted through my main account, which is why I made that statement. If he reached out via another account, it wasn’t my intention to mislead anyone. I misunderstood the situation at the time, and I apologize for any confusion in my earlier statement.
What disappoints me is that I didn’t take any amount from him. I took his remote and was prepared to clear the exam without any advance payment. If he disconnected and copied the VMware that I transferred to his system, why aren’t you asking him about that? I have mentioned this several times, yet neither you nor he has addressed it.
Anyways, let it be now. I will learn from this and keep it in mind. Please tell me how to proceed further. Am I supposed to pay any fine, or what should I do?

---

@freedom, if you really had an exam and are worried about getting banned, know that when I connect remotely, I got your IP address., an exam schedule snapshot, and this thread as proof that could be used. No one wants to jeopardize the business. If we do so we wouldn't be able to sustain ourselves on BreachForums or any other forum for even one day. Offsec is always a dream, so have some sense.

BreachForums is open to everyone. If any seller engages in questionable practices, anyone can raise an issue. Additionally, I manage a Hack The Box group that's open for discussion; if I ever do anything wrong with a customer, my reputation there would suffer.

[FernandoCaliente]

Sorry guys, it is none of my business here but I had to stand up when I saw that RedBlock was in trouble as it feels a bit unfair.

That guy helped me by 3 times already and never tried to scam me.
There might be something unclear here, but that guy is gold, always responsive, pro and try his best to give the best service.

He also always offered to use Breach escrow in order to avoid trust issue/trouble.

PS: he has been recommended by a friend when he was still Lost-Gem, so I am sure that he built a solid reputation all along the way.
The best would be to request the users on his Telegram group in order to get a feel about his reputation

This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: (Permanent)
Ban Reason: Replying to someone else's scam report | Failure to follow the first fucking rule of the scam reports section

[freedom]

Again you are just trying to mislead. During telegram conversation you never said about escrow service. on setup day you said offsec exam script changed they detect your setup and all so now its not possible to do remote exam. then you deleted chat 




you deleted almost 3 time whole chats so if you really don't want to scam me then what's your intention. why you tell me to book my exam then suddenly you said offsec change script. you have my ip but thats dynamic brother not static. you try to hide your another telegram user account also i luckily found here in your thread so i have proof to proove both accounts belongs to you else intially you was not ready to accept you have another telegram account. don't try to be innocent now your intentions was completely bad you think after deleting chat you can easily save you.

you dont have my registered email and all else you will definetly share my details to offsec. you already did cheap act by saying offsec have changed scripts and then deleted chat man same time i confirmed about script from other seller and they confirm its still same.  how many story you will make now to hide your faults.

[RedBlock]

I confirm ,the script and the exam is still the same.I am taking OSCP remote exams for 1500$.Are not many sellers who can safely pass your exam,many students got banned and their cert revoked even after a year they got the cert.Do some research before you are booking your exam with someone..I know,my price is high but none of my customers failed or got banned.

@ExamServices,

When I started offering remote passing services, I invested $12K in a fully FUD RAT to ensure that customers wouldn’t face any trouble. Security and stealth have always been my top priorities from day one.

Your price is high, and we all know you've built a solid reputation I genuinely admire your work. But not everyone can afford that much, and that’s where affordability and trust come into play. You’ve established your market perfectly, and I respect that, but there’s always a demand for reliable and cost effective solutions as well.

At the end of the day, it’s not just about passing it’s about doing it safely, ensuring long term security, and keeping customers' records clean. That’s why I’ve always focused on a balance between security, affordability, and reliability.

---

@freedom
Let’s get one thing straight I don’t need your registered email to cause problems for you. If I really had bad intentions, there are N number of ways people get banned by certification providers. But I don’t operate like that because I run a business, not some petty scam. So stop playing victim and accept that you backed out when you were not able to get remote passing software.

I clearly mentioned using escrow here in this thread, but you ignored it again and again.

Also, you still haven’t answered why you copied the VM to your pendrive. If you had no bad intentions, why do that in the first place? You keep dodging this question while trying to shift the blame onto me.

And yes, you know what real trust is? It’s having a scam tag on the group yet still getting customers for remote passing because they know the truth. When there’s a thread going on about this so called scam, yet I haven’t even taken $1 from you, and I’m still doing two OSCP+ exams on the same day that’s trust. When we build trust with our customers, it’s something that can’t be broken. They know me well enough, which is why they keep preferring me.

[freedom]

I confirm ,the script and the exam is still the same.I am taking OSCP remote exams for 1500$.Are not many sellers who can safely pass your exam,many students got banned and their cert revoked even after a year they got the cert.Do some research before you are booking your exam with someone..I know,my price is high but none of my customers failed or got banned.

@ExamServices,

When I started offering remote passing services, I invested $12K in a fully FUD RAT to ensure that customers wouldn’t face any trouble. Security and stealth have always been my top priorities from day one.

Your price is high, and we all know you've built a solid reputation I genuinely admire your work. But not everyone can afford that much, and that’s where affordability and trust come into play. You’ve established your market perfectly, and I respect that, but there’s always a demand for reliable and cost effective solutions as well.

At the end of the day, it’s not just about passing it’s about doing it safely, ensuring long term security, and keeping customers' records clean. That’s why I’ve always focused on a balance between security, affordability, and reliability.

---

@freedom
Let’s get one thing straight I don’t need your registered email to cause problems for you. If I really had bad intentions, there are N number of ways people get banned by certification providers. But I don’t operate like that because I run a business, not some petty scam. So stop playing victim and accept that you backed out when you were not able to get remote passing software.

I clearly mentioned using escrow here in this thread, but you ignored it again and again.

Also, you still haven’t answered why you copied the VM to your pendrive. If you had no bad intentions, why do that in the first place? You keep dodging this question while trying to shift the blame onto me.

And yes, you know what real trust is? It’s having a scam tag on the group yet still getting customers for remote passing because they know the truth. When there’s a thread going on about this so called scam, yet I haven’t even taken $1 from you, and I’m still doing two OSCP+ exams on the same day that’s trust. When we build trust with our customers, it’s something that can’t be broken. They know me well enough, which is why they keep preferring me.

brother this scam report is not about you have taken any money this scam report regarding my exam because of you i booked my exam you choose day then i booked exam then you started cheap act like scripts changed and all.  now lets talk about you are claiming pendrive and vm your buddy who connect with me he personally check my system it was HP pc he run systeminfo command check my ip and all then you started asking my email name and all . if you have any proof i used vm or something then share it here i just shared all correct info here with proper evidence not doing any false claim like you

you are saying again and again about escrow so during our telegram conversation you never said about escrow second thing our deal was pay after exam and before report so i don't have any issue about that. here things are different you are trying to divert the actual reason of this scam report i never claimed you taken money and all i said because of you i booked exam and at last moment you started offsec changed script that time i dont have option to cancel or reschedule option so i opened this scam report for taking free retake from you . you are just trying to misleading all info to divert mods and other community members


and who is this guy @FernandoCaliente why he is replying on my thread  its better check first rule then comment to my thread may be its your alt same like multiple telegrams @ Do not reply to a thread if you are not the original poster, the person accused, or staff.

[freedom]

To the the attention of the moderation team:

Even if some elements still need to be determined about what happened, you should not take any quick and unfair decision for several reasons:

1. There was no real damage proven here: the "victim" claimed to be scammed or that there was a scam attempt BUT:
- There was no money engaged - as RedBlock always clearly explained that he only take the money AFTER passing successfully the exam - so there is no reason to call it a scam here
- RedBlock even offered to give the "victim" a free attempt to avoid the bad consequences on his business

2. It is not impossible that the "victim" attempted to steal the method from RedBlock, failed and is now complaining because he missed his shot and he is frustrated
As a "simple reader" of this topic, I can see that the copy of the VM snapshot on a PenDrive has not been clearly replied until now and the victim only highlighted the fact that he was scammed repeatedly (without proving any real damage). Why not replying and clearing that question clearly?

3. In order to take the best decision, just consider checking RedBlock's Telegram group - what he claimed is real. I, as many other customers, are having daily discussions there and never complained about any scam.
I also bet that his reputation has never been questioned in the past here. I mean, the guy, always tries to help people and is very active and I never read anything bad related to him.

4. Several customers or potential customers are reading this topic without speaking/being involved and will make their own idea about the RedBlock, but also about the different sellers engaged and their contributions in the current discussion - so it would be better for everyone and for business in general to solve that matter in a friendly way and for the user "freedom" to address the unclear points, or at least, be willing to solve that case in good faith.

Again some things seem about to be unfair here and before condemning the bad actions, the questions are still:
- what are these bad actions? what is the damage?
- Why was the VM snapshot copied on a Pendrive?

listen message from your original account not from alt just ask him  why he deleted chats , why  he started crying offsec changed script and all in same time other seller confirmed everything is ok and if you guys have any proof i used vm or pendrive then send proof here don't pass any fake statement without proof

he was guilty and he don't know how to do remote thats why first he try to start making story exam script changed then next he said i will share writeups use those to do exam then deleted chat when i open scam report then he ask someone else to do my exam but in middle of that again he started another story because may be he have to pay more fee to him so he thought to ask email in name of ip and vpn. had ever offsec send anyone 3-4 hours before Exam ip and vpn file if yes then share proof here

[RedBlock]

Guys thanks for the concern
No need to comment I'll handle it not am issue for me.

[Loki]

@Loki
I did suggest using BreachForums escrow multiple times, and the buyer declined. I have shared proof in my previous comment. I still offered him an alternative arrangement, allowing him to take the exam and pay afterward. This was not a refusal of escrow; it was an option I provided based on his preferences. There is no mistake in that from my side. If i had to scan him then why would have keep him insisting it again and again to use escrow.

This is a bs statement. You provided an option for dealing without escrow. You cannot cry about not using escrow if you provided that option to @freedom. Its called living in the hindsight.

I have not received a satisfactory response to the 4 offenses. Answer them one by one.

---

And if your explanation is that you didnt realize what the scam report is about, and act like you didnt have a whole argument before this was posted, I'm gonna make my own conclusions about your credibility from that.

[RedBlock]

@Loki, let me address the points one by one:

Script Change (First Offense):
When we spoke on Telegram, he mentioned having an exam but focused heavily on technical details asking how the remote software works, where I purchased it, and how much it cost rather than confirming a booking. Based on that, I informed him about the script change. This wasn’t the first time someone tried to gather information about remote passing methods. it got proved when he copied the VM to his pendrive.

Claiming the Buyer Never Contacted Me (Second Offense):
There was some confusion regarding which account was used. I was under the impression that I wasn’t contacted through my main account, which is why I made that statement. If he reached out via another account, it wasn’t my intention to mislead anyone. I’ve explained this before, and I have apologized for any misunderstanding that may have arisen.

Misleading with Telegram Username (Third Offense):
I shared the username that is linked to my BreachForums account. If my intentions were bad, I could have easily changed or deleted that account. I provided my public username without any intent to hide information.

Claiming Screenshots Were Edited (Fourth Offense):
We had an extensive discussion on Telegram, yet he selectively shared only the snapshots where I mentioned the script change. He did not include the parts where he was asking detailed technical questions about the remote setup. Without the full context, the conversation appears incomplete, and that’s why I raised concerns about the screenshots. I have shared some Telegram chat snapshots above as proof; you can check those.

I’m disappointed that I’ve answered every point raised all the time, yet no one has asked him anything at all. Why did he copy the VM? Why, if I was ready to clear his exam, did he not proceed even after I installed the remote software on his laptop? I haven’t taken any amount from him, and he himself accepts that. The whole issue here is that I initially denied taking his exam, and later, after this thread started, I proceeded with the exam but then he refused to continue. What exactly is my mistake in this scenario?

Throughout this entire discussion, I’ve responded to every point, stayed patient, and clarified things repeatedly. Meanwhile, Freedom has been consistently rude, making accusations, and twisting the situation. If I had truly done something wrong, would I be here explaining everything in detail? I haven’t taken a single dollar from him, yet he keeps pushing a one-sided narrative. Fair judgment should consider both sides, not just who shouts the loudest.

Please proceed with the final judgment. I hope the decision isn’t one-sided. Rest assured, I will accept whatever is decided whether it’s a ban ( temp ban ), a fine $, a free exam ( if he actually had one ), or any other resolution that is fair after considering both parties points fully.

[freedom]

I never asked you how its work and from where you but it and all these shits if i ask these things then why i will make scam report against you man. you are again and again saying it was vm pendrive so please share proof . you deleted chats all time not me so if you are saying anything then share proof also to proove those things

ok if i don't share all information you can share man if my intention was wrong then i will delete chat not you but in current situation you deleted chat then i started here scam report against you so please provide according to your claims else don't say anything without proof

i have limited screenshot because same time those things i asked to other seller they confirm exam script is still same so i started taking screenshot of your chats. you are still trying to mislead by just passing wrong info if you are saying something so please share proof also